<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMS Summer Institute in Algebraic Geometry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/07/28/ams-summer-institute-in-algebraic-geometry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/07/28/ams-summer-institute-in-algebraic-geometry/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/07/28/ams-summer-institute-in-algebraic-geometry/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 06:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/07/29/ams-summer-institute-in-algebraic-geometry/#comment-99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s new, I think.  Aren&#039;t Gromov-Witten invariants fairly new?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s new, I think.  Aren&#8217;t Gromov-Witten invariants fairly new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/07/28/ams-summer-institute-in-algebraic-geometry/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigfpe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/07/29/ams-summer-institute-in-algebraic-geometry/#comment-98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are these &#039;unlikely connections&#039; old things from decades ago or very recent stuff? String Theory has been tightly connected to Algebraic Geometry for as long as I remember. For example the fact that String theory prefers to live in certain dimensions (eg. 26 for bosonic strings) comes straight from the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these &#8216;unlikely connections&#8217; old things from decades ago or very recent stuff? String Theory has been tightly connected to Algebraic Geometry for as long as I remember. For example the fact that String theory prefers to live in certain dimensions (eg. 26 for bosonic strings) comes straight from the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
