<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bishop quote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did the same search as sigfpe, but it looks like Randians are contrasting constructivism to objectivism.  (I guess they mean constructivism in the sense of &quot;reality is social constructed&quot;.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the same search as sigfpe, but it looks like Randians are contrasting constructivism to objectivism.  (I guess they mean constructivism in the sense of &#8220;reality is social constructed&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigfpe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not one to let an unsubstantiated comment stand I googled the four queries:

objectivism constructivism &quot;home page&quot;
objectivism -constructivism &quot;home page&quot;
-objectivism constructivism &quot;home page&quot;
-objectivism -constructivism &quot;home page&quot;

to find the number of home pages of people professing either ideology.

I then constructed the table of number of occurences of these two words:

653         87,400
177,000     1,1760,000,000

A chi-squared test shows this to be off the scale for significance. So there is, indeed, a correlation.

:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not one to let an unsubstantiated comment stand I googled the four queries:</p>
<p>objectivism constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;<br />
objectivism -constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;<br />
-objectivism constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;<br />
-objectivism -constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;</p>
<p>to find the number of home pages of people professing either ideology.</p>
<p>I then constructed the table of number of occurences of these two words:</p>
<p>653         87,400<br />
177,000     1,1760,000,000</p>
<p>A chi-squared test shows this to be off the scale for significance. So there is, indeed, a correlation.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.arsmathematica.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy.s</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy.s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some reason this guy strikes me as someone who&#039;s really into Ayn Rand.  

Have you noticed any correlation between constructivists and objectivists?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason this guy strikes me as someone who&#8217;s really into Ayn Rand.  </p>
<p>Have you noticed any correlation between constructivists and objectivists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
