<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All your base are belong to us.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perelman&#039;s proof is just a sketch, and not complete (and apparently he has no plans to make it complete).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perelman&#8217;s proof is just a sketch, and not complete (and apparently he has no plans to make it complete).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johan.richter</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johan.richter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought Perelman intended his papers as just an outline, and not as a complete proof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Perelman intended his papers as just an outline, and not as a complete proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess my question is, was Perelman&#039;s proof determined to be lacking, and thus just an outline?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my question is, was Perelman&#8217;s proof determined to be lacking, and thus just an outline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woit</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[woit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not complete crap.  Cao and Zhu are claiming to have come up with a complete proof of both Poincare and Geometrization, based on Perelman&#039;s outline.  It has been vetted by Yau and is supposed to appear in this month&#039;s issue of the Asian Journal of Mathematics.  The pdf file for the paper is not online there yet, and I don&#039;t know of anyone who has a copy (if someone knows where a copy can be found, let me know).

As far as I know, many of the experts in this subject have not yet seen the paper or had a chance to go through it.

Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not complete crap.  Cao and Zhu are claiming to have come up with a complete proof of both Poincare and Geometrization, based on Perelman&#8217;s outline.  It has been vetted by Yau and is supposed to appear in this month&#8217;s issue of the Asian Journal of Mathematics.  The pdf file for the paper is not online there yet, and I don&#8217;t know of anyone who has a copy (if someone knows where a copy can be found, let me know).</p>
<p>As far as I know, many of the experts in this subject have not yet seen the paper or had a chance to go through it.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
