http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/ Dedicated to the mathematical arts. Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41 http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1394 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:56:45 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1394 Tao did not get the Fields Medal because of their joint paper.

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1392 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:44:52 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1392 It seems strange that Tao got one but not Green.

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1391 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:15:17 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1391 He’s only 29.

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1390 Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:46:29 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1390 Was Ben Green ineligible?

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1388 Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:47:08 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1388 Not quite as impressive a performance as last time, though. For a while, I thought Tao was going to be the only one just because that was the only prediction you made (at the time, it was widely claimed that Perelman wasn’t eligible).

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1387 Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:01:05 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/08/22/2006-icm-prizes/#comment-1387 BOOOOYA!. Thank you very much…thank you.

]]>