Comments on: Navier-Stokes Problem Solved? http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/05/380/ Dedicated to the mathematical arts. Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41 By: Walt http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1449 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:45:52 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1449 I updated the post accordingly.

Euler’s point about the theorem apparently applying to Burger’s equation was a good one, but I didn’t check the preprint to see if it was really right.

]]> By: John C. Baez http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1448 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:03:47 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1448 Penny Smith has withdrawn her paper claiming to prove global-in-time existence of solutions for the Navier-Stokes equation, citing a “serious flaw”. Try the remarks by “Euler” on Peter Woit’s blog for more details.

]]> By: Memories of a Weird Traveller » Blog Archive » Progress in the Navier-Stokes problem? http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1447 Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:28:17 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1447 […] Via Ars Mathematica: […]

]]>