<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mathwear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigfpe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS The &quot;classical Maxwell equations&quot; are actually Heaviside&#039;s equations. Maxwell&#039;s were pretty hideous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS The &#8220;classical Maxwell equations&#8221; are actually Heaviside&#8217;s equations. Maxwell&#8217;s were pretty hideous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigfpe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proof is in a movie called &quot;It&#039;s My Turn&quot;. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080936/) ThIs proof is cited on page 11 of Weibel&#039;s &quot;An Introduction to Homological Algebra&quot;!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proof is in a movie called &#8220;It&#8217;s My Turn&#8221;. (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080936/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080936/</a>) ThIs proof is cited on page 11 of Weibel&#8217;s &#8220;An Introduction to Homological Algebra&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have two guesses:

The Mirror Has Two Faces or Antonia&#039;s Line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two guesses:</p>
<p>The Mirror Has Two Faces or Antonia&#8217;s Line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 05:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to admit that in terms of visual aesthetics, the classical Maxwell equations look better than the differential form version.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that in terms of visual aesthetics, the classical Maxwell equations look better than the differential form version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigfpe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trivia question: In which movie is the Snake Lemma correctly proved?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trivia question: In which movie is the Snake Lemma correctly proved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose I wouldnt mind a T-shirt with the snake lemma on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I wouldnt mind a T-shirt with the snake lemma on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigfpe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At some point I really need to make myself a homology diagram T-shirt in the style of Venet (http://www.bernarvenet.com/). You&#039;d buy one wouldn&#039;t you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point I really need to make myself a homology diagram T-shirt in the style of Venet (<a href="http://www.bernarvenet.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bernarvenet.com/</a>). You&#8217;d buy one wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot guys!  Now, before every christmas and every birthday, I&#039;m going to worry that some well-meaning, but non-mathematical relative will get me something I&#039;ll be too embarrassed to show in public ... oh ... nevermind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot guys!  Now, before every christmas and every birthday, I&#8217;m going to worry that some well-meaning, but non-mathematical relative will get me something I&#8217;ll be too embarrassed to show in public &#8230; oh &#8230; nevermind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Baez</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John C. Baez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool!  But they need some better consultants.  

Writing Maxwell&#039;s equations and saying &quot;Let there be light&quot; - good.  Writing them the old-fashioned way as four separate equations instead of using differential forms to write simply

*d*dA = J

- less good.  Writing them in the form suitable for condensed matter physics, with D and H fields as well as E and B - worse.

A T-shirt with Heisenberg&#039;s uncertainty principle on it - good.  A T-shirt with Heisenberg&#039;s uncertainty principle on it together with a snip of the Sistine Chapel and the words &quot;FREE WILL&quot; - less good.  (Quantum mechanics is not needed for free will.)

&quot;If you consider the set of all sets that have never been considered, will it disappear?&quot;  Cute, but silly: for one thing, considering this set does not mean you considered all (or even any) of its elements.  Why not do a real Russell&#039;s paradox T-shirt?

And so on.  We need some serious math T-shirt designers.  

My favorite so far is from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cafepi.ca/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cafe Pi&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!  But they need some better consultants.  </p>
<p>Writing Maxwell&#8217;s equations and saying &#8220;Let there be light&#8221; &#8211; good.  Writing them the old-fashioned way as four separate equations instead of using differential forms to write simply</p>
<p>*d*dA = J</p>
<p>&#8211; less good.  Writing them in the form suitable for condensed matter physics, with D and H fields as well as E and B &#8211; worse.</p>
<p>A T-shirt with Heisenberg&#8217;s uncertainty principle on it &#8211; good.  A T-shirt with Heisenberg&#8217;s uncertainty principle on it together with a snip of the Sistine Chapel and the words &#8220;FREE WILL&#8221; &#8211; less good.  (Quantum mechanics is not needed for free will.)</p>
<p>&#8220;If you consider the set of all sets that have never been considered, will it disappear?&#8221;  Cute, but silly: for one thing, considering this set does not mean you considered all (or even any) of its elements.  Why not do a real Russell&#8217;s paradox T-shirt?</p>
<p>And so on.  We need some serious math T-shirt designers.  </p>
<p>My favorite so far is from <a href="http://www.cafepi.ca/" rel="nofollow">Cafe Pi</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
