<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Stylings of Nicholas Bourbaki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/12/20/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/12/20/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/12/20/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/12/21/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the example of so(3) may be the first time Lie algebras seemed interesting.  When I studied vector calculus, I hated the cross product, just because it so obviously did not generalize to higher dimensions.  I liked the so(3) explanation, since it obviously did generalize.

Bourbaki earned the superfluous &#039;h&#039; two days ago.  (In all these years, I never noticed that it was spelled without the &#039;h&#039;.)

Eisenbud is a terrific book, if you are interested in commutative algebra.  (If you&#039;re not intrinsically interested in the subject, then I&#039;m not sure the book is so great that it will change your mind.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the example of so(3) may be the first time Lie algebras seemed interesting.  When I studied vector calculus, I hated the cross product, just because it so obviously did not generalize to higher dimensions.  I liked the so(3) explanation, since it obviously did generalize.</p>
<p>Bourbaki earned the superfluous &#8216;h&#8217; two days ago.  (In all these years, I never noticed that it was spelled without the &#8216;h&#8217;.)</p>
<p>Eisenbud is a terrific book, if you are interested in commutative algebra.  (If you&#8217;re not intrinsically interested in the subject, then I&#8217;m not sure the book is so great that it will change your mind.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComplexZeta</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/12/20/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ComplexZeta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/12/21/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I to take this as a recommendation for Eisenbud?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I to take this as a recommendation for Eisenbud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Baez</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/12/20/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John C. Baez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/12/21/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since when is his name spelled &#039;Nicholas&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when is his name spelled &#8216;Nicholas&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Borovik</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2006/12/20/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexandre Borovik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/12/21/bourbaki-in-not-even-wrong-comments/#comment-1515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The first time I saw the definition of Lie algebra, my reaction was â€œHuh?â€ &quot;

It is one of the principal blind spots of undergraduate mathematics - the cross product of vectors in 3-dimensional Euclidean space is occasionally mentioned, but I had not seen an undergraduate textbook which would discuss a fundamental fact: the cross product is the Lie multiplication in the Lie algebra of the group SO(3) of rotations of 3-dimensional Euclidean space. We live inside of a Lie algebra.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The first time I saw the definition of Lie algebra, my reaction was â€œHuh?â€ &#8221;</p>
<p>It is one of the principal blind spots of undergraduate mathematics &#8211; the cross product of vectors in 3-dimensional Euclidean space is occasionally mentioned, but I had not seen an undergraduate textbook which would discuss a fundamental fact: the cross product is the Lie multiplication in the Lie algebra of the group SO(3) of rotations of 3-dimensional Euclidean space. We live inside of a Lie algebra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
