<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geometric Logic at Sea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/2012/02/20/geometric-logic-at-sea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2012/02/20/geometric-logic-at-sea/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2012/02/20/geometric-logic-at-sea/#comment-69091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=1558#comment-69091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;... Captain Queeg ... it drives you insane.&quot; Is David Brown the mathematical equivalent of Captain Queeg? Everyone has ignored David Brown&#039;s work on the RaÃ±ada-Milgrom effect and everything else.
http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Navier-Stokes_Equations/ 
 Since mathematical understanding of the Navierâ€“Stokes equations is considered important, the Clay Mathematics Institute offered a prize in May 2000 for problems based on a specific set of definitions for solving the Navier-Stokes problem. There are two Existence cases  (A), (B) and two Breakdown cases (C)=not(A), (D)=not(B). This brief communications claims to demonstrate the truth of (C), i.e., there some smooth initial data for the Navier-Stokes equations that lead to breakdown for any possible smooth continuation that solves the Navier-Stokes equations according to the Clay prize conditions.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1204.0004v1.pdf  Is superstring theory essential for understanding nonlinear partial differential equations? Can someone please explain to David Brown what is wrong with the alleged counterexample? Is David Brown the mathematical equivalent of Captain Queeg?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; Captain Queeg &#8230; it drives you insane.&#8221; Is David Brown the mathematical equivalent of Captain Queeg? Everyone has ignored David Brown&#8217;s work on the RaÃ±ada-Milgrom effect and everything else.<br />
<a href="http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Navier-Stokes_Equations/" rel="nofollow">http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Navier-Stokes_Equations/</a><br />
 Since mathematical understanding of the Navierâ€“Stokes equations is considered important, the Clay Mathematics Institute offered a prize in May 2000 for problems based on a specific set of definitions for solving the Navier-Stokes problem. There are two Existence cases  (A), (B) and two Breakdown cases (C)=not(A), (D)=not(B). This brief communications claims to demonstrate the truth of (C), i.e., there some smooth initial data for the Navier-Stokes equations that lead to breakdown for any possible smooth continuation that solves the Navier-Stokes equations according to the Clay prize conditions.<br />
<a href="http://vixra.org/pdf/1204.0004v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://vixra.org/pdf/1204.0004v1.pdf</a>  Is superstring theory essential for understanding nonlinear partial differential equations? Can someone please explain to David Brown what is wrong with the alleged counterexample? Is David Brown the mathematical equivalent of Captain Queeg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dasuxullebt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/2012/02/20/geometric-logic-at-sea/#comment-68991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dasuxullebt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=1558#comment-68991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The movie is from 1952 - I am not sure whether the concept of gemetric logic was even invented back then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie is from 1952 &#8211; I am not sure whether the concept of gemetric logic was even invented back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
