Comments on: Finite dimensional algebras and quivers http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/ Dedicated to the mathematical arts. Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:32:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: beans http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-52766 beans Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:03:12 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-52766 Is it bad that I had to google FToC!! I'm sure Steve could have us differentiating instead. :D (I'm not a big fan of integration.) Is it bad that I had to google FToC!! I’m sure Steve could have us differentiating instead. :D (I’m not a big fan of integration.)

]]> By: John Armstrong http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-52705 John Armstrong Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:39:12 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-52705 beans: depends on the method. Integration by FToC, sure. Integration by parts, great. Integration by partial fractions.. enh. And I'm about to move to the Southern states where they just do <em>not</em> do integration by court order. beans: depends on the method. Integration by FToC, sure. Integration by parts, great. Integration by partial fractions.. enh. And I’m about to move to the Southern states where they just do not do integration by court order.

]]> By: beans http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-52699 beans Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:03:37 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-52699 <p>Maybe the new filter thing didn't work after all! Although fourier series sound nasty- I'm sure no one would object to doing integrals! (Hi Steve. :D)</p> Maybe the new filter thing didn’t work after all! Although fourier series sound nasty- I’m sure no one would object to doing integrals! (Hi Steve. :D)

]]> By: Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Baez Week 230 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-1323 Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Baez Week 230 Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:32:33 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-1323 [...] Week 230 of John Baez’s This Week’s Finds in Mathematical Physics is out. He has returned to one of his favorite subjects (and really, one of everyone’s favorite subjects), Dynkin diagrams. We covered some of the same topics here and here. [...] [...] Week 230 of John Baez’s This Week’s Finds in Mathematical Physics is out. He has returned to one of his favorite subjects (and really, one of everyone’s favorite subjects), Dynkin diagrams. We covered some of the same topics here and here. [...]

]]> By: Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Crawley-Boevey on Quivers et al http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-63 Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Crawley-Boevey on Quivers et al Wed, 06 Jul 2005 06:26:27 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-63 [...] m Crawley-Boevey. He provides lecture notes covering quivers (which we’ve discussed before), the cohomological approach to central simple [...] [...] m Crawley-Boevey. He provides lecture notes covering quivers (which we’ve discussed before), the cohomological approach to central simple [...]

]]> By: sigfpe http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-4 sigfpe Thu, 12 May 2005 21:39:13 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-4 They seem to have lost my account and when I reregistered with the same username it didn't protest that the account was taken. Anyway, those AMS articles are great. And I hadn't met quivers before I found that article a couple of months ago. Surprising how much good stuff comes out of something that at first glance seems like a trivial concept. They seem to have lost my account and when I reregistered with the same username it didn’t protest that the account was taken.

Anyway, those AMS articles are great. And I hadn’t met quivers before I found that article a couple of months ago. Surprising how much good stuff comes out of something that at first glance seems like a trivial concept.

]]> By: Walt http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-3 Walt Thu, 12 May 2005 17:55:00 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-3 Good recommendation. That's much easier to read than the survey article. I have to say that I find the new registration system for the Notices annoying. Good recommendation. That’s much easier to read than the survey article.

I have to say that I find the new registration system for the Notices annoying.

]]> By: sigfpe http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/05/11/finite-dimensional-algebras-and-quivers/#comment-2 sigfpe Thu, 12 May 2005 01:26:49 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=10#comment-2 For an easy(ish) to read introduction I recommend the article on quiver representations <a href="http://www.ams.org/notices/200502/fea-weyman.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>. For an easy(ish) to read introduction I recommend the article on quiver representations here.

]]>