This entry was posted
on Tuesday, June 28th, 2005 at 11:51 pm and is filed under Mathematics.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
3 Responses to “Urs Lang on Geometric Measure Theory”
Has this become the measure theory web site? I feel severely handicapped. I went to Cambridge you see. Cambridge University is in every way superior to Oxford University (everyone knows that!) except in one respect: at Cambridge they teach the Riemann integral but at Oxford they teach the Lebesgue integral. The advantage of the Cambridge approach is that we can get on and integrate things before we’re mature enough to grasp concepts like Borel sets. But the downside is that I’m crippled for life.
June 29th, 2005 at 5:40 pm
Has this become the measure theory web site? I feel severely handicapped. I went to Cambridge you see. Cambridge University is in every way superior to Oxford University (everyone knows that!) except in one respect: at Cambridge they teach the Riemann integral but at Oxford they teach the Lebesgue integral. The advantage of the Cambridge approach is that we can get on and integrate things before we’re mature enough to grasp concepts like Borel sets. But the downside is that I’m crippled for life.
June 29th, 2005 at 6:37 pm
Apparently you can just start using the Gauge integral, and it will be all better.
June 29th, 2005 at 11:00 pm
As long as no one thinks we’re the proof theory web site.