http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/06/28/urs-lang-on-geometric-measure-theory/ Dedicated to the mathematical arts. Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:25:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/06/28/urs-lang-on-geometric-measure-theory/#comment-44 Walt Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:00:56 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=71#comment-44 As long as no one thinks we're the proof theory web site. As long as no one thinks we’re the proof theory web site.

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/06/28/urs-lang-on-geometric-measure-theory/#comment-42 michael Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:37:56 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=71#comment-42 Apparently you can just start using the Gauge integral, and it will be all better. :) Apparently you can just start using the Gauge integral, and it will be all better.

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/06/28/urs-lang-on-geometric-measure-theory/#comment-41 sigfpe Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:40:30 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=71#comment-41 Has this become the measure theory web site? I feel severely handicapped. I went to Cambridge you see. Cambridge University is in every way superior to Oxford University (everyone knows that!) except in one respect: at Cambridge they teach the Riemann integral but at Oxford they teach the Lebesgue integral. The advantage of the Cambridge approach is that we can get on and integrate things before we're mature enough to grasp concepts like Borel sets. But the downside is that I'm crippled for life. Has this become the measure theory web site? I feel severely handicapped. I went to Cambridge you see. Cambridge University is in every way superior to Oxford University (everyone knows that!) except in one respect: at Cambridge they teach the Riemann integral but at Oxford they teach the Lebesgue integral. The advantage of the Cambridge approach is that we can get on and integrate things before we’re mature enough to grasp concepts like Borel sets. But the downside is that I’m crippled for life.

]]>