http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/11/03/163/ Dedicated to the mathematical arts. Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:18:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/11/03/163/#comment-183 Walt Sat, 05 Nov 2005 03:44:01 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=163#comment-183 That trope link is one of the bizarrest I've ever seen. That trope link is one of the bizarrest I’ve ever seen.

]]> http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/11/03/163/#comment-182 easwaran Fri, 04 Nov 2005 11:56:46 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=163#comment-182 There's a lot of good entries on subjects one might not have thought were philosophical there - in mathematics, note entries on <a HREF="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/boolalg-math/" rel="nofollow">Boolean Algebra</a>, <a HREF="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/modeltheory-fo/" rel="nofollow">Model Theory</a>, <a HREF="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/set-theory/" rel="nofollow">Set Theory</a>, <a HREF="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/category-theory/" rel="nofollow">Category Theory</a>, and even one that talks quite a bit about <a HREF="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tropes/#10" rel="nofollow">Sheaf Theory</a> (they don't get too much into the mathematical details there, because the technical philosophical details are already a bit much, and there's only so much mathematics a general philosophical audience can be expected to tolerate). There’s a lot of good entries on subjects one might not have thought were philosophical there - in mathematics, note entries on Boolean Algebra, Model Theory, Set Theory, Category Theory, and even one that talks quite a bit about Sheaf Theory (they don’t get too much into the mathematical details there, because the technical philosophical details are already a bit much, and there’s only so much mathematics a general philosophical audience can be expected to tolerate).

]]>