<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bishop quote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-54316</link>
		<dc:creator>John Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-54316</guid>
		<description>Well right off I can see a problem.  "A is A" is an axiom &lt;em&gt;schema&lt;/em&gt;, not an axiom.  I always knew those people were intellectually sloppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well right off I can see a problem.  &#8220;A is A&#8221; is an axiom <em>schema</em>, not an axiom.  I always knew those people were intellectually sloppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Greinecker</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-54314</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Greinecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-54314</guid>
		<description>Andrej Bauer, who seems to have a certain sympathy for constructivism actually wrote a nice parody of objectivism: &lt;a href="http://andrej.com/objectivism/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Become an Objectivist
in Ten Easy Steps&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrej Bauer, who seems to have a certain sympathy for constructivism actually wrote a nice parody of objectivism: <a href="http://andrej.com/objectivism/" rel="nofollow">Become an Objectivist<br />
in Ten Easy Steps</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-193</guid>
		<description>I did the same search as sigfpe, but it looks like Randians are contrasting constructivism to objectivism.  (I guess they mean constructivism in the sense of "reality is social constructed".)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the same search as sigfpe, but it looks like Randians are contrasting constructivism to objectivism.  (I guess they mean constructivism in the sense of &#8220;reality is social constructed&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>sigfpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Not one to let an unsubstantiated comment stand I googled the four queries:

objectivism constructivism "home page"
objectivism -constructivism "home page"
-objectivism constructivism "home page"
-objectivism -constructivism "home page"

to find the number of home pages of people professing either ideology.

I then constructed the table of number of occurences of these two words:

653         87,400
177,000     1,1760,000,000

A chi-squared test shows this to be off the scale for significance. So there is, indeed, a correlation.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not one to let an unsubstantiated comment stand I googled the four queries:</p>
<p>objectivism constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;<br />
objectivism -constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;<br />
-objectivism constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;<br />
-objectivism -constructivism &#8220;home page&#8221;</p>
<p>to find the number of home pages of people professing either ideology.</p>
<p>I then constructed the table of number of occurences of these two words:</p>
<p>653         87,400<br />
177,000     1,1760,000,000</p>
<p>A chi-squared test shows this to be off the scale for significance. So there is, indeed, a correlation.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.arsmathematica.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy.s</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2005/12/03/bishop-quote/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>andy.s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=178#comment-191</guid>
		<description>For some reason this guy strikes me as someone who's really into Ayn Rand.  

Have you noticed any correlation between constructivists and objectivists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason this guy strikes me as someone who&#8217;s really into Ayn Rand.  </p>
<p>Have you noticed any correlation between constructivists and objectivists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
