<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easwaran on Conditional Probability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/05/17/easwaran-on-conditional-probability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/05/17/easwaran-on-conditional-probability/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: easwaran</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/05/17/easwaran-on-conditional-probability/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>easwaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 17:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/05/17/easwaran-on-conditional-probability/#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the publicity!

Anyway, that first paper is a development of the ideas in the first half of the second one, so there's a good deal of redundancy if you look at both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the publicity!</p>
<p>Anyway, that first paper is a development of the ideas in the first half of the second one, so there&#8217;s a good deal of redundancy if you look at both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
