Comments on: All your base are belong to us. http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/ Dedicated to the mathematical arts. Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:36:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Walt http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1303 Walt Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:21:59 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1303 Perelman's proof is just a sketch, and not complete (and apparently he has no plans to make it complete). Perelman’s proof is just a sketch, and not complete (and apparently he has no plans to make it complete).

]]> By: johan.richter http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1302 johan.richter Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:31:54 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1302 I thought Perelman intended his papers as just an outline, and not as a complete proof. I thought Perelman intended his papers as just an outline, and not as a complete proof.

]]> By: michael http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1301 michael Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:14:59 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1301 I guess my question is, was Perelman's proof determined to be lacking, and thus just an outline? I guess my question is, was Perelman’s proof determined to be lacking, and thus just an outline?

]]> By: woit http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1300 woit Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:44:20 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/06/05/all-your-base-are-belong-to-us/#comment-1300 It's not complete crap. Cao and Zhu are claiming to have come up with a complete proof of both Poincare and Geometrization, based on Perelman's outline. It has been vetted by Yau and is supposed to appear in this month's issue of the Asian Journal of Mathematics. The pdf file for the paper is not online there yet, and I don't know of anyone who has a copy (if someone knows where a copy can be found, let me know). As far as I know, many of the experts in this subject have not yet seen the paper or had a chance to go through it. Peter It’s not complete crap. Cao and Zhu are claiming to have come up with a complete proof of both Poincare and Geometrization, based on Perelman’s outline. It has been vetted by Yau and is supposed to appear in this month’s issue of the Asian Journal of Mathematics. The pdf file for the paper is not online there yet, and I don’t know of anyone who has a copy (if someone knows where a copy can be found, let me know).

As far as I know, many of the experts in this subject have not yet seen the paper or had a chance to go through it.

Peter

]]>