Comments on: Navier-Stokes Problem Solved? http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/ Dedicated to the mathematical arts. Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:56:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Walt http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/comment-page-1/#comment-1449 Walt Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:45:52 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1449 I updated the post accordingly. Euler's point about the theorem apparently applying to Burger's equation was a good one, but I didn't check the preprint to see if it was really right. I updated the post accordingly.

Euler’s point about the theorem apparently applying to Burger’s equation was a good one, but I didn’t check the preprint to see if it was really right.

]]> By: John C. Baez http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/comment-page-1/#comment-1448 John C. Baez Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:03:47 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1448 Penny Smith has <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0609740" rel="nofollow">withdrawn her paper</a> claiming to prove global-in-time existence of solutions for the Navier-Stokes equation, citing a "serious flaw". Try the remarks by "Euler" on <a href="http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=470" rel="nofollow">Peter Woit's blog</a> for more details. Penny Smith has withdrawn her paper claiming to prove global-in-time existence of solutions for the Navier-Stokes equation, citing a “serious flaw”. Try the remarks by “Euler” on Peter Woit’s blog for more details.

]]> By: Memories of a Weird Traveller » Blog Archive » Progress in the Navier-Stokes problem? http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/comment-page-1/#comment-1447 Memories of a Weird Traveller » Blog Archive » Progress in the Navier-Stokes problem? Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:28:17 +0000 http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/05/380/#comment-1447 [...] Via Ars Mathematica: [...] [...] Via Ars Mathematica: [...]

]]>