<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mathwear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>sigfpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>PS The "classical Maxwell equations" are actually Heaviside's equations. Maxwell's were pretty hideous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS The &#8220;classical Maxwell equations&#8221; are actually Heaviside&#8217;s equations. Maxwell&#8217;s were pretty hideous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>sigfpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>The proof is in a movie called "It's My Turn". (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080936/) ThIs proof is cited on page 11 of Weibel's "An Introduction to Homological Algebra"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proof is in a movie called &#8220;It&#8217;s My Turn&#8221;. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080936/) ThIs proof is cited on page 11 of Weibel&#8217;s &#8220;An Introduction to Homological Algebra&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>I have two guesses:

The Mirror Has Two Faces or Antonia's Line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two guesses:</p>
<p>The Mirror Has Two Faces or Antonia&#8217;s Line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 05:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that in terms of visual aesthetics, the classical Maxwell equations look better than the differential form version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that in terms of visual aesthetics, the classical Maxwell equations look better than the differential form version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>sigfpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Trivia question: In which movie is the Snake Lemma correctly proved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trivia question: In which movie is the Snake Lemma correctly proved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>I suppose I wouldnt mind a T-shirt with the snake lemma on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I wouldnt mind a T-shirt with the snake lemma on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator>sigfpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1475</guid>
		<description>At some point I really need to make myself a homology diagram T-shirt in the style of Venet (http://www.bernarvenet.com/). You'd buy one wouldn't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point I really need to make myself a homology diagram T-shirt in the style of Venet (http://www.bernarvenet.com/). You&#8217;d buy one wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot guys!  Now, before every christmas and every birthday, I'm going to worry that some well-meaning, but non-mathematical relative will get me something I'll be too embarrassed to show in public ... oh ... nevermind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot guys!  Now, before every christmas and every birthday, I&#8217;m going to worry that some well-meaning, but non-mathematical relative will get me something I&#8217;ll be too embarrassed to show in public &#8230; oh &#8230; nevermind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Baez</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Baez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2006/10/25/mathwear/#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Cool!  But they need some better consultants.  

Writing Maxwell's equations and saying "Let there be light" - good.  Writing them the old-fashioned way as four separate equations instead of using differential forms to write simply

*d*dA = J

- less good.  Writing them in the form suitable for condensed matter physics, with D and H fields as well as E and B - worse.

A T-shirt with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle on it - good.  A T-shirt with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle on it together with a snip of the Sistine Chapel and the words "FREE WILL" - less good.  (Quantum mechanics is not needed for free will.)

"If you consider the set of all sets that have never been considered, will it disappear?"  Cute, but silly: for one thing, considering this set does not mean you considered all (or even any) of its elements.  Why not do a real Russell's paradox T-shirt?

And so on.  We need some serious math T-shirt designers.  

My favorite so far is from &lt;a href="http://www.cafepi.ca/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cafe Pi&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!  But they need some better consultants.  </p>
<p>Writing Maxwell&#8217;s equations and saying &#8220;Let there be light&#8221; - good.  Writing them the old-fashioned way as four separate equations instead of using differential forms to write simply</p>
<p>*d*dA = J</p>
<p>- less good.  Writing them in the form suitable for condensed matter physics, with D and H fields as well as E and B - worse.</p>
<p>A T-shirt with Heisenberg&#8217;s uncertainty principle on it - good.  A T-shirt with Heisenberg&#8217;s uncertainty principle on it together with a snip of the Sistine Chapel and the words &#8220;FREE WILL&#8221; - less good.  (Quantum mechanics is not needed for free will.)</p>
<p>&#8220;If you consider the set of all sets that have never been considered, will it disappear?&#8221;  Cute, but silly: for one thing, considering this set does not mean you considered all (or even any) of its elements.  Why not do a real Russell&#8217;s paradox T-shirt?</p>
<p>And so on.  We need some serious math T-shirt designers.  </p>
<p>My favorite so far is from <a href="http://www.cafepi.ca/" rel="nofollow">Cafe Pi</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
