<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Gettier Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/05/16/internet-gettier-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/05/16/internet-gettier-problem/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/05/16/internet-gettier-problem/#comment-36161</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/05/16/internet-gettier-problem/#comment-36161</guid>
		<description>I'd say the slippery part of the Gettier problem is the definition of "justified."  Who is to judge what qualifies as justified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the slippery part of the Gettier problem is the definition of &#8220;justified.&#8221;  Who is to judge what qualifies as justified?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
