<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumors of the abc conjecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/06/19/rumors-of-the-abc-conjecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/06/19/rumors-of-the-abc-conjecture/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: blink</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/06/19/rumors-of-the-abc-conjecture/#comment-56376</link>
		<dc:creator>blink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2007/06/19/rumors-of-the-abc-conjecture/#comment-56376</guid>
		<description>I’ heard that the idea of using muliplication of points on elliptic curves to prove the abc conjecture is not new, but given in an arxiv paper, before this paper. What is your opinion on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ heard that the idea of using muliplication of points on elliptic curves to prove the abc conjecture is not new, but given in an arxiv paper, before this paper. What is your opinion on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
