<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perfect Groups Viewed Topologically</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2008/08/04/perfect-groups-viewed-topologically/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2008/08/04/perfect-groups-viewed-topologically/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the mathematical arts.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2008/08/04/perfect-groups-viewed-topologically/#comment-61354</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=692#comment-61354</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
So far, what I like about it most is that it gives me hope for really understanding Quillen’s plus construction! 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I had the exact same reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
So far, what I like about it most is that it gives me hope for really understanding Quillen’s plus construction!
</p></blockquote>
<p>I had the exact same reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Baez</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2008/08/04/perfect-groups-viewed-topologically/#comment-61351</link>
		<dc:creator>John Baez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=692#comment-61351</guid>
		<description>Cool article.  So far, what I like about it most is that it gives me hope for really understanding Quillen's plus construction!  On page 6, it talks about a "Kan-Thurston theorem", which says that the homotopy category of spaces is equivalent to a category where an object is a group together with a perfect normal subgroup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool article.  So far, what I like about it most is that it gives me hope for really understanding Quillen&#8217;s plus construction!  On page 6, it talks about a &#8220;Kan-Thurston theorem&#8221;, which says that the homotopy category of spaces is equivalent to a category where an object is a group together with a perfect normal subgroup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2008/08/04/perfect-groups-viewed-topologically/#comment-61308</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=692#comment-61308</guid>
		<description>Fixed.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jablow</title>
		<link>http://www.arsmathematica.net/archives/2008/08/04/perfect-groups-viewed-topologically/#comment-61302</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jablow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arsmathematica.net/?p=692#comment-61302</guid>
		<description>Your link to the Wikipedia article on perfect groups has a typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link to the Wikipedia article on perfect groups has a typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
