Wikipedia policy change?

I’ve learned to take all media articles about internet phenomena with a grain of salt, but this article from news.com, Growing Pains for Wikipedia, claims that Wikipedia is changing its policy so that anonymous users cannot create new pages (they can still edit existing pages). While practically speaking it’s a small change, it’s a big change in Wikipedia philosophy. The online encyclopedia has always prided itself in the ability of anyone to edit, with the notion that making participation as easy as possible will attract more and higher quality editing.

Bishop quote

Eric Schechter’s Handbook of Analysis and Its Foundations has a cool quote from constructivist mathematician Errett Bishop:

Mathematics belongs to man, not to God. We are not interested in properties of the positive integers that have no descriptive meaning for finite man. When a man proves a positive integer to exist, he should show how to find it. If God has mathematics of his own that needs to be done, let him do it himself.

Newcomb’s paradox

I’ve just run across an interesting thought experiment known as Newcomb’s paradox. Suppose there is a being, called the Predictor, that presents you with a choice. There are two boxes. The first box may or may not contain $1,000,000. The second box always contains $1,000. You can choose to open either one box or both boxes. While you are making your choice, the Predictor does not touch the boxes in any way — whether or not the first box contains money is already determined.

Many people have encountered the Predictor before, and have discovered that he seems to always predict what you are going to do. Anyone who has ever chosen to open just the first box receives the $1,000,000. Any who has ever chosen to open both boxes finds the first box empty, and only receives $1,000.

Which would you choose?